About GFSF

My photo
GFSF serves as an industry platform to help improve food safety in the Asian market. This blog offers the most up-to-date news on Asia's food safety events.

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Regulating GM Food Labeling in China

ShanghaiDaily.com 2014-05-27

File photo/Xinhua


BEIJING, May 27 (Xinhua) -- China is to improve its regulations on labeling genetically modified (GM) food to guarantee consumer rights.
The measure was included in a guideline issued by the State Council, the country's cabinet, to boost food safety, according to a government statement issued on Tuesday.
The guideline did not give details about the stricter rule to be implemented.
GM food remains controversial in China and consumers have complained it is hard to distinguish GM food from non-GM food due to poor labeling. 

Chinese Government Urges Food Safety

English.news.cn   2014-05-27 13:10:19


According to a government statement on Tuesday, the Chinese State Council, the country’s cabinet, issued guidelines to increase food safety in 2014.Safety measures are to include:
o    Stricter monitoring of the quality of baby formulas and a campaign to punish illegal use of food additives;
o    Greater efforts to improve food quality of meat products and harsher regulations for those who incorporate the use of sick or dead animals;
o    Proper handling of kitchen waste and the prohibition of process waste edible oil use;

o    An amendment draft to the Food Safety Law tripling fines for food safety violations and carrying a lifetime ban from the industry for violators. 

Friday, May 2, 2014

Food safety during and after a power outage: Keep it or toss it out?

Food safety can be a major concern for people during a power outage. There are several things to do in advance and tips to follow after power is restored.

With the April 2014 Midwest span of spring storms, power outages have become common. Michigan State University Extension advises consumers that food safety can be a major concern for people during an outage, especially when the electric company can’t give you an estimated time for when the power will be back on. The following are suggestions for advanced preparation to help keep food safe in case of a power outage:
  • Make sure your appliances have thermometers; it is the best way to ensure your food is safe in case there is a power outage. Temperatures are considered safe if they are 40 degrees Fahrenheit or lower in the refrigerator or zero degree or lower in the freezer.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) recommends the following tips to follow:
  • Keep the refrigerator and freezer doors closed as much as possible to maintain the cold temperature.
    • The refrigerator will keep food cold for about four hours if it is unopened.
    • A full freezer will keep the temperature for approximately 48 hours (24 hours if it is half full) if the door remains closed.
    • Buy dry or block ice to keep the refrigerator as cold as possible if the power is going to be out for a prolonged period of time. Fifty pounds of dry ice should hold an 18-cubic foot fully-stocked freezer cold for two days.
  • If you plan to eat refrigerated or frozen meat, poultry, fish or eggs while it is still at safe temperatures, it’s important that each item is thoroughly cooked to the proper temperature to assure that any foodborne bacteria that may be present is destroyed. However, if at any point the food was above 40 degrees Fahrenheit for two hours or more, discard it.
  • Wash fruits and vegetables with water from a safe source before eating.
  • For infants, try to use prepared, canned baby formula that requires no added water. When using concentrated or powdered formulas, prepare with bottled water if the local water source is potentially contaminated
Once power is restored you will need to determine the safety of your food. Here’s how:
  • If an appliance thermometer was kept in the freezer, check the temperature when the power comes back on. If the freezer thermometer reads 40 degrees Fahrenheit or below, the food is safe and may be refrozen.
  • If a thermometer has not been kept in the freezer, check each package of food to determine its safety. You can’t rely on appearance or odor. If the food still contains ice crystals or is degrees Fahrenheit or below, it is safe to refreeze or cook.
  • Refrigerated food should be safe as long as the power was out for no more than four hours and the refrigerator door was kept shut. Discard any perishable food (such as meat, poultry, fish, eggs or leftovers) that has been above 40 degrees Fahrenheit for two hours or more.
Keep in mind that perishable food such as meat, poultry, seafood, milk and eggs that are not kept adequately refrigerated or frozen may cause a foodborne illness if consumed, even when they are thoroughly cooked. Following these guidelines can help ensure that no one will become sick from tainted foods.

Thursday, May 1, 2014

GFSF welcomes GCCA as a new strategic partner



Alexandria, Virginia, May 2, 2014

For Immediate Release
Contact
Eric Wu
Director, GFSF and Financial Services/China
Tel. 703-684-1366
GFSF welcomes GCCA as a new strategic partner
Global Food Safety Forum (GFSF) is pleased to announce that Global Cold Chain Alliance (GCCA) has become a new strategic partner of GFSF.

GCCA provides specialized cold chain advisory services to government agencies, organizations, and associations. Over the past 15 years, GCCA has worked with international donors such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Millennium Challenge Corporation, U.S. Agency for International Development, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Trade and Development Agency to provide specialized cold chain and related advisory services.
GFSF is a non-profit industry organization with a diverse membership base of leading multinational companies in the global food chain, Chinese companies, US state departments of agriculture, and trade associations. The Forum’s core activities have been workshops under USDA and member sponsorship; rapid response services on-site to solve immediate food safety issues; liaison with Chinese government regulatory and oversight agencies; and reciprocal delegation visits to China and the US.
For additional information on AB SCIEX and on GFSF partnership, as well as the upcoming Beijing Food Safety Summit in June, please contact:


GFSF
Eric Wu
Director, GFSF and Financial Services/China
GIC Group
1434 Duke Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
Tel. 703-684-1366
web: www.gicgroup.com

GCCA
Richard Tracy
Vice President, International Programs
Global Cold Chain Alliance


Friday, April 25, 2014

Update: More Than 100 Illnesses Reported After Food Safety Summit

The Baltimore City Health Department and the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene have received more than 100 reports of illness after the Food Safety Summit held April 8-10 at the Baltimore Convention Center.

According to an update sent out Tuesday morning to the approximately 1,300 FSS attendees, most of the illnesses reported relate to “self-limited diarrhea.”
A state health official noted that they have heard from about 400 people and that no associated hospitalizations or deaths have been reported.
“We are working on evaluating possible exposures and doing testing at the Maryland state public health laboratory to attempt to identify an agent. At the conclusion of the investigation, a summary report will be available,” Tuesday’s update stated.
Those who attended the FSS and have not yet responded to an online survey are being asked to do so now. More information may be obtained by contacting the Division of Outbreak Investigation at (410) 767-6700 or by email at DHMH.Outbreaks@maryland.gov.
Sara Luell, a spokeswoman for the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, sent out a statement Thursday afternoon noting that initial reports of illness had come in from four attendees at the FSS:
“Although we are in the initial stages of the investigation, there are currently no reported hospitalizations or deaths related to these illnesses. There are also currently no reports of illnesses associated with other conferences at the Baltimore Convention Center. The investigation is ongoing.”
According to Michael Schwartzberg, public information officer for the Baltimore City Health Department, four calls came in on April 15 and 16 from people “complaining of feeling sick with diarrhea, upset stomach and other related symptoms about 12 hours after eating a meal at the Baltimore Convention Center on April 9.”
The city dispatched two environmental health sanitarians to the convention center on April 16, Schwartzberg stated, who did an “extensive investigation” at Centerplate, the center’s in-house caterer.
“With the exception of one issue, everything was in compliance with codes and regulations. Centerplate was issued a violation for condensation dripping from one of the 2 ice machines in the kitchen, and this issue was immediately corrected,” Schwartzberg wrote in an email. He added that no violations were noted at the most recent regularly scheduled inspection there on Feb. 27.
This year’s 16th-annual FSS drew more than 1,500 attendees from across the spectrum of the food industry, including growers, processors, retailers, distributors, food-service operators, regulators and academia.

China says one-fifth of its farmland is polluted with toxic metals

FACED with growing public anger about a poisonous environment, China's government released a study that shows nearly one-fifth of the country's farmland is contaminated with toxic metals, a stunning indictment of unfettered industrialization under the Communist Party's authoritarian rule.

The report, previously deemed so sensitive it was classified as a state secret, names the heavy metals cadmium, nickel and arsenic as the top contaminants.
It adds to widespread doubts about the safety of China's farm produce and confirms suspicions about the dire state of its soil following more than two decades of explosive industrial growth, the overuse of farm chemicals and minimal environmental protection.
It also points to health risks that, in the case of heavy metals, can take decades to emerge after the first exposure. Already, health advocates have identified several “cancer villages” in China near factories suspected of polluting the environment where they say cancer rates are above the national average.
The soil survey was conducted from 2005 until last year, and showed contamination in 16.1 per cent of China's soil overall and 19.4 per cent of its arable land, according to a summary released late on Thursday by China's Environmental Protection Ministry and its Land and Resources Ministry.
“The overall condition of the Chinese soil allows no optimism,” the report said. Some regions suffer serious soil pollution, worrying farm land quality and “prominent problems” with deserted industrial and mining land, it said. Contamination ranged from “slight,” which indicated up to twice the safe level, to “severe.”
The report's release shows China's authoritarian government responding to growing public anger at pollution with more openness, but only on its own terms and pace. Early last year, Beijing-based lawyer Dong Zhengwei had demanded that the government release the soil findings, but was initially rebuffed by the environment ministry, which cited rules barring release of “state secrets.”
That led to criticism from the Chinese public, and even from some arms of the state media. The Communist Party-run People's Daily declared that, “Covering this up only makes people think: We're being lied to.” The ministry later acknowledged the information should be shared, said Dong, who attributed this week's release of the report to public pressure.
Without a release of the information, “the public anger would get stronger, and soil contamination would deteriorate, while news of cancer villages and poisonous rice would continue to spring up,” Dong, an antitrust lawyer, said in an interview on Friday.
Because some of the samples in the survey, which is the first of its kind in China, date back nearly a decade, the results would likely be much worse if tests were taken today, Dong said.
He said the government should conduct soil surveys and release the results on an annual basis and respond with immediate remediation measures.
China's leaders have said they are determined to tackle the country's pollution problem, though the threat to soil has so far been overshadowed by public alarm at smog and water contamination. However, recent scandals of tainted rice and crops have begun to shift attention to soil.
A key concern among scientists is cadmium, a carcinogenic metal that can cause kidney damage and other health problems and is absorbed by rice, the country's staple grain.
Last May, authorities launched an investigation into rice mills in southern China after tests found almost half of the supplies sold in Guangzhou, a major city, were contaminated with cadmium.
In early 2013, the newspaper Nanfang Daily reported that tens of thousands of tons of cadmium-tainted rice had been sold to noodle makers in southern China since 2009. It said government inspectors declared it fit only for production of non-food goods such as industrial alcohol but a trader sold most of the rice to food processors anyway.
The worst pollution detailed in this week's report centres around the country's most industrialised regions, the Yangtse and Pearl River deltas in southern China, as well heavily industrial portions of the northeast.
The summary of findings gave no detailed breakdown of contamination by region. It said most of the contaminated soil had levels of pollutants ranging from just above the allowable limit to double the limit, while for 1.1 per cent of the country's soil the contaminants were at five times the safety limit or more.
Lu Yizhong, a soil contamination expert at China Agricultural University, said soil surveys must become more frequent, with detailed results published regularly. More legislation is needed to control the problem, he said.
Warning that food safety was emerging as a “thorny issue” for China, Lu said the effects of the gradual accumulation of toxic metals in the bodies of people who eat contaminated produce can take years to unfold. “Sometime it can take 10 to 30 years to develop serious disease.”
China must step up efforts to monitor and regulate soil contamination “otherwise the speed of new contamination will surely outpace efforts to rein it back,” he said.
AP

Track-and-Trace Technology in the Food Supply Chain

Globalization has created a fragmented, complex and vulnerable food supply chain. While globalization is an essential part of the international food trade, it has also exposed food suppliers and distributors to a higher risk of contamination, bioterrorism, counterfeit and poor quality. Not only do these risks pose a threat to public health and safety, but it also compromises environmental sustainability, erodes public trust, and cripples a company’s business and productivity.
With so much at stake, regulators have worked tirelessly to improve safety measures and compliance in the United States. Food manufacturers and distributors have also implemented new processes and technologies to help circumvent these risks in the supply chain. Food traceability technology is one approach to bridging this gap between safety and compliance, and is becoming a critical part of safeguarding the food supply chain.
Food safety is a global concern, yet the U.S. continues to lag far behind its peer countries with regard to its safety practices. Frost & Sullivan estimates that a total of 76 million food-related illness cases occurred in 2013, with the U.S. spending $40 billion dollars on treatment rather than prevention. Considering the wholesale food industry has an extensive value chain, the costs to treat and further prevent these food-related illnesses are astounding.
Traceability technology effectively reduces the number of contaminations in the food industry’s value chain by monitoring all the events in the supply chain, and catching where a contamination or quality control problem has occurred. Of course, not all traceability solutions are created equal. An effective track-and-trace technology must be robust enough to capture large amounts of data gathered from countless events. It must also be capable of processing all this data in real-time speed. If it breaks down, the interruption can be felt through the entire supply chain, from production to distribution, all the way down to delivery.
Food distributors and manufacturers know that the margin for human error is high in the supply chain, which is why companies cannot afford to neglect traceability technology. Take a look at the statistics around product recalls: In 2013, companies spent approximately $25 billion on recalls. Overall, there was a 52 percent increase in food recalls between the third and fourth quarters in 2013, according to one index report.
As a result, there has been an increase in focus on regulations surrounding the food supply chain. Most recently, the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), which passed in 2011. This renewed focus starts with heightened regulation at farming levels and culminates with increased safety standards for consumers. The law stems from a heightened risk in the food supply chain. The U.S. imports over 15 percent of the products in its food supply. The increasingly heterogonous food marketplace presents new hazards previously unknown. Given the risks associated with this potentially hazardous industry, FSMA gives the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) more power to enforce compliance through inspections and the ability to stop food manufacturers from operating unsafe production lines.

FSMA has a three-pronged approach to food safety as outlined by its three pillars of success:
  • Prevention—mandated preventive controls for food production facilities, in addition to updated food safety standards that guarantees farm to fork safety.
  • Inspection, compliance and response—new mandatory inspection protocols with increased frequency, prevention-based mandatory food recalls on uninfected produce and the ability to cease operations of unsafe food production facilities.
  • Imports—new requirements for foreign suppliers to verify food safety through the use of certified third parties.
While applauding the efforts made by Capitol Hill and the FDA to improve regulatory standards, there is still more to be done. It’s imperative that private sectors reduce the cost of product recalls and focus on improving food safety globally. The administration of track-and-trace technologies throughout the food supply chain increases communication and safety throughout a product’s pipeline, and advances food safety around the world.
Traceability software is a key component to reducing food recalls and the costs associated with them. Take, for example, a recent E. coli outbreak in Germany, cited by BCC Research Food Traceability Technologies Market. The outbreak cost European Union farmers $611,000,000 per week, claiming 47 lives and affecting nearly 3,800 people worldwide who ingested the contaminated produce. German authorities falsely accused Spanish farms for the outbreak, which resulted in a loss of nearly $200 million per week for Spanish exporters. Due to the lack of traceability software, the highly publicized outbreak experienced delays in finding the source of the contamination and preventing additional loss of life.
Track-and-trace technology plays a critical role in the event of product recalls. As an enterprise resource planning (ERP) add-on, it has a unique advantage since ERP systems function as a single point of data across the enterprise. When connected to a company’s ERP, traceability software is ideally positioned for recording and maintaining data related to track and trace. Therefore, the technology is often a one-stop solution to facilitate backward and forward traceability within an enterprise.
In the case of food manufacturers who produce finished products, process software solutions that can detail lot tracking information (backward and forward) are able to point to the exact lots that contained the contaminated ingredients, including data on when the product was received, supplier details and the lot numbers of the finished goods produced with the contaminated ingredient. With the help of forward traceability features, manufacturers can also pinpoint the customers who received the contaminated lot of finished goods.
In the event of a product recall, traceability software repositories can pull up the relevant lot numbers, and information about the corresponding customers or recipients of the finished goods. Only the contaminated lots have to be recalled, which translates into significant cost savings for manufacturers who would have otherwise had to issue a blanket recall on all lots produced during a given time period.
The effect of globalization is both a blessing and a curse for businesses. The food ecosystem, in particular, is dependent on imports and exports, global safety standards, and compliance to maintain food safety throughout the supply chain. Track-and-trace technology is a significant part of this supply chain, helping farmers, distributors, grocers and everyone in between provide the highest quality foods to customers around the world. Time after time, we’ve seen the negative impact food recalls have on businesses, health and consumer lives. It is time then for the food industry to implement traceability technology to prevent the spread of contaminated products and safeguard customers worldwide.

.